Interim Measures for Generative AI
Four actions are indispensable when illegal content is found: prompt disposal, rectification, reporting and record keeping. Deleting the content without reporting, or reporting without rectifying, does not satisfy Article 14.
Article 14, paragraph 1 addresses content: where a provider finds illegal content, it shall promptly take disposal measures such as stopping generation, stopping transmission and eliminating the content, take measures such as model optimisation training to rectify the situation, and report to the competent authorities.
There are three layers here. The first is immediate disposal, and the measures include stopping generation (blocking the current output), stopping transmission (blocking the spread) and eliminating the content (clearing what has already been produced). The second is rectification, which explicitly requires measures such as model optimisation training, meaning reducing recurrence at the root cause rather than only cleaning up a single point. The third is reporting to the competent authorities.
Article 14, paragraph 2 addresses users: where a provider finds a user using a generative AI service to engage in illegal activity, it shall, in accordance with law and agreement, take disposal measures such as warning, restricting functions, or suspending or terminating the provision of the service to that user, keep the relevant records, and report to the competent authorities.
The key phrase in paragraph 2 is in accordance with law and agreement. In accordance with law means the disposal must have a legal basis; in accordance with agreement means these measures must be agreed in advance in the service agreement, otherwise enforcement lacks contractual support. Keeping the relevant records is required explicitly as well.
Article 19 adds a duty to cooperate: when the competent authorities carry out supervision and inspection, providers shall cooperate in accordance with the law, explain the source, scale and type of training data, the labelling rules, the algorithm mechanism and so on as required, and provide the necessary technical and data support and assistance.
Which department do we report to? Article 14 says the competent authorities. The specific reporting channel and time limit follow your local cyberspace administration; internally, name the contact department and the responsible person in advance.
If the user deletes the content, do we still have to report? Disposal and reporting are two independent actions. Finding illegal content triggers the action requirements in paragraph 1, and they are not lifted because the content has since been deleted.
The model outputs illegal content only occasionally -- does this article still apply? The trigger in Article 14 is finding illegal content, and it does not turn on whether the problem is occasional. Occasional problems also go through disposal, rectification and reporting, and model optimisation training is used to reduce recurrence.
This entry belongs to the “China AI Compliance and Filing” cluster (42 entries in total): View all · Answers home
Who we are: a knowledge base and AI customer service team serving small and micro businesses, delivering implementations that take AI customer service through the national standard and the filing process.
Content on this site is compiled from publicly released regulatory texts for enterprises' own self-check reference; the specific filing requirements of the local cyberspace administration authorities prevail, and this is not legal advice.
This page is generated from the China AI compliance and filing MCP corpus — agents can call the same data directly.
渝ICP备2026003920号-1 · 工信部备案查询
Published by SavantCat · source https://savantcat.cn/en/answers/compliance/genai-illegal-content-disposal.html · please keep the attribution when quoting.