Algorithmic recommendation and filing
As long as algorithmic recommendation technology is applied to provide internet information services to users within the People’s Republic of China, the provisions apply, regardless of the size of the company, of whether a fee is charged and of whether personalisation is used.
Article 2 sets the scope very widely: applying algorithmic recommendation technology to provide internet information services within the People’s Republic of China (referred to as algorithmic recommendation services) is governed by these provisions, and only where laws or administrative regulations provide otherwise do those other provisions apply. The second paragraph of the same article defines the technology: algorithmic recommendation technology as referred to in the preceding paragraph means the use of algorithmic technologies of the generative-synthesis, personalised push, ranking and selection, retrieval and filtering, and dispatch and decision-making categories to provide information to users.
In other words, at least five categories of technology are named: home-page information feeds, short-video recommendation, search result ordering, leaderboards and selections, and dispatch and scheduling. Many teams assume that not doing personalised recommendation keeps them safe; but if any link in the product orders, filters, recommends or dispatches, it may fall into the retrieval and filtering or the dispatch and decision-making category.
The regulatory structure is also set out in Article 3: the national cyberspace administration department coordinates algorithmic recommendation service governance and the related supervision and administration nationwide; local cyberspace administration departments coordinate the work within their own administrative areas; and the relevant departments of the State Council and of local governments in telecommunications, public security and market regulation each handle supervision and administration within their own duties.
Treating the absence of a recommendation algorithm in the product as an exemption, when default back-office ordering, trending lists and filters are algorithmic recommendation technology too. Mistaking a system used only by internal staff and not offered to the public for a covered case, and then in turn missing the mini-program, the web version and open interfaces. Some enterprises review only the main app and overlook the same algorithm being output to third-party channels through an interface — while the provisions are framed by the provision of a service, not by the client application.
This knowledge base only retrieves and reports the text of the provisions; it does not replace formal legal advice. Where the characterisation of a specific product is in question, put the product description in writing and consult the cyberspace administration authority for your locality.
This entry belongs to the China AI Compliance & Filing cluster (42 entries in total): View all · Answers home
Who we are: a knowledge base and AI customer service team serving small and micro enterprises, doing hands-on delivery for AI customer service — meeting GB/T 47746-2026 and completing filing.
Content on this site is compiled from publicly released regulatory texts and is provided for enterprise self-check reference. The filing position of the cyberspace administration authority in your locality governs; nothing here is legal advice.
This page is generated from the China AI Compliance & Filing MCP corpus — agents can call the same dataset directly.